Bushlow v. Bushlow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*664Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the parties’ so-ordered stipulation of settlement dated January 26, 2009, which was incorporated, but not merged, into the judgment of divorce, did not comply with the requirements of the Child Support Standards Act (hereinafter the CSSA; see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [h]; see generally Cimons v Cimons, 53 AD3d 125, 127-131 [2008]). The stipulation did not recite that the parties were advised of the provisions of the CSSA, and that the basic child support obligation provided for therein would presumptively result in the correct amount of support…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cimons v. CimonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Pellot v. PellotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Warnecke v. WarneckeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Lepore v. LeporeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Cardinal v. CardinalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bushlow v. BushlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- A.L.B. v. A.L.B.New York Supreme Court · 2015
- PANZARELLA, JAMES v. PANZARELLA, KARENAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Panzarella v. PanzarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Panzarella v. PanzarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.