Legal Opinion

People v. Reisner

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided December 29, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

DeAndrea, C. M.

One Charles P. Dinegar, a detective, a member of the police department of the city of New York, prior to the 16th day of September, 1936, was duly assigned for duty *471with the Labor Department of the State of New York, at the request of the State Industrial Commissioner, and with the consent of the commissioner of police of the city of New York, and on that day, and for some time thereafter, said detective continued such assignment. During the course thereof said officer, as appears by the complaint before the court, charged the defendant, Sam Reisner, with having unlawfully…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Averill, New York County Courts1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API