Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Ford

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 27, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWelsh, J.

This civil action was commenced to collect a credit card debt alleged to be due from the defendant. A companion action was brought roughly simultaneously for another credit card debt owed by the same defendant. The companion action resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff and is not the subject of this appeal. Its relevance is limited to the issue of the defendant’s notice or knowledge of the pendency of the instant action.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the motion judge erred in her determination that the court had acquired personal jurisdiction over the defendant.

The officer’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farley v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Bird v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Konan v. CarrollMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Atlas Elevator Co. v. StasinosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  5. Smith v. ArnoldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Verizon Yellow Pages Co. v. FoderaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API