Legal Opinion

United States v. Brooks

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 24, 1981No. 39,584; CM 438933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

During the instructional phase of appellant’s general court-martial1 before a panel of officer members, the military judge instructed the court in accordance with the standard military reasonable doubt instructions contained in paragraphs 2-4, Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-9, Military Judges’ Guide (May 19, 1969). At trial the defense counsel objected with extensive specificity to the equation of reasonable and substantial doubt and he offered, unsuccessfully, alternative instructions. We have granted this case to consider the accused’s continued assertion of this…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SalleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. CottenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Solomon Monk, Also Known as David L. Martin v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, CommandantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. MartinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. CherryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. BrooksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
  5. United States v. JohnwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API