Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 15, 1871PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Livingston Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

The plaintiff, Thomas, having obtained judgment against John Wheeler, garnished Patterson for the purpose of procuring satisfaction of his debt. Charles Wheeler appeared and filed his inter-pleader, and claimed that the debt of Patterson was due and owing to him, and not to John Wheeler. It appears from the record that John Wheeler sold to Patterson a certain piece of land, and in payment, at the request of the said John Wheeler, Patterson executed his promissory notes to Charles Wheeler to satisfy a pre-existing indebtedness which, it is alleged, John owTed to Charles. The issue was whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Darrett v. DonnellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  2. Jolliffe v. CollinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  3. Moss v. BoothSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Humes v. O'Bryan & WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Creighton v. HoppisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Vermillion v. LeClareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Sitz & Co. v. Herzberg-Loveman D. G. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Warlick v. PetersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API