Legal Opinion

People v. Rudnick

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant moved to dismiss the information “ on the ground that the facts stated therein do not constitute a violation of section 114 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the State of New York nor a crime under any law of this State.” We think this motion was the equivalent of a demurrer to the information. (Code Crim. Proc. §§ 323, subd. 2, 324.) The Presiding Justice of the Court of Special Sessions entered upon the information the following indorsement: “ Motion to dismiss denied.” Since we think this entry was sufficient as an order disallowing the demurrer (Code Crim. Proc. § 326),…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mollis v. CawseNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. GoldsteinNew York City Court of Special Sessions · 1948
  3. People v. JacobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API