Barrell v. Tilton
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCOTT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OR OREGON. This was an action for the possession of a tract of land containing thirteen acres and a quarter of an acre in Multnomah. County, Oregon. The plaintiff was a citizen of New York, and the defendants are citizens of Oregon.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE CIRCOTT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OR OREGON. This was an action for the possession of a tract of land containing thirteen acres and a quarter of an acre in Multnomah. County, Oregon. The plaintiff was a citizen of New York, and the defendants are citizens of Oregon. In the complaint they were alleged to be husband and wife, though they were not sued as such,, and no averment founded Upon that relationship was made; they were sued simply as parties in occupation of the premises. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff- was the otvner in fee of the land and…
1Opinion of the Court
■Me. Justice Field,
after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court.
Of the numerous points made by the defendants below,' the plaintiffs in error here, only three require notice. The others are either immaterial or unsupported by the record. The three are these:
1st. The ruling of the court on the demurrer of Aurelia to the complaint;
2d. The ruling of the court that the decree of the state court was conclusive as to the right of Aurelia to mortgage the property for the" debt of her husband; and .
3d. The ruling sustaining the validity of the sale under the decree of the state…
2Cited by10 opinions
- McCrea v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- South Utah Mines & Smelters v. Beaver CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Fisher v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. Standard Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.