Lessee of Barger v. Jackson
Ohio Supreme Court
Ejectment. Prom Pike. Upon trial a verdict was taken for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the court. The plaintiff claims, two hundred acres of land to which his lessors claim title through a deed *from the auditor of Pike, under a sale for taxes,, on a judgment rendered in 1823, under the act entitled “ an act providing for the remission of penalties, and for the sale of lands for taxes,” passed January 30, 1822. This tract was divided by the county line, • between…
Read the full summary
Ejectment. Prom Pike. Upon trial a verdict was taken for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the court. The plaintiff claims, two hundred acres of land to which his lessors claim title through a deed *from the auditor of Pike, under a sale for taxes,, on a judgment rendered in 1823, under the act entitled “ an act providing for the remission of penalties, and for the sale of lands for taxes,” passed January 30, 1822. This tract was divided by the county line, • between Pike and Highland. The agreed facts seek a construction of a part of that law, and will be sufficiently detailed in the…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Wood, Judge.
The 3d section of the act of the 30th of January, 1822, 2 Ch. St. 1216, provides, that the state auditor shall, on or before the 1st of May, 1822, transmit to the county auditors a list of the land within respective counties, on which arrearages ■of taxes were charged previous to 1820, and which remained unpaid, with a statement of corrections. This the county auditor is required to compare with the duplicates in his office, correct, and advertise a corrected list of the delinquent lands, and certify to the state auditor his corrections, from which duplicates were…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Wallace v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860