Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. De Leon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 20, 1998No. 13-97-622-CRPublished

1DissentYanez, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

I first believe it is incumbent upon this Court to recognize that few of the State’s issues, if any, were preserved for review. The rules of appellate procedure generally require that all complaints by an appellant have been preserved for review by any one of various possible procedures. See Tex.R.App. P. 33.1. In the instant case and in all cases part of this consolidated appeal, the State never objected to the court’s show cause order or the hearing at which the court dismissed these causes. The State did not object on the ground that it did not have notice the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API