Legal Opinion

Stanley Miller Construction Co. v. Ohio School Facilities Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 2011No. Nos. 10AP-298, 10AP-299, 10AP-432, 10AP-433PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Connor, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellee and cross-appellant, Stanley Miller Construction Company (“Stanley Miller”), has filed an application for en banc consideration or, in the alternative, for reconsideration of this court’s December 28, 2010 decision, in which we reversed the judgments of the Court of Claims of Ohio. Stanley Miller Constr. Co. v. Ohio School Facilities Comm., Franklin App. No. 10AP-298, 2010-Ohio-6397, 2010 WL 5544013. Appellants and cross-appellees, Ohio School Facilities Commission, the state of Ohio, and the Canton City School District Board of Education (collectively, “OSFC”),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State v. OwensOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State Ex Rel. Petro v. GoldOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. In re J.J.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. McFadden v. Cleveland State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holfinger v. Stonespring/Carespring, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Jensen v. AdChoice, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Norman v. Kellie Auto Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Ayer v. Morenz-HarbingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Johnson v. Cincinnati Metro. Hous. Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API