Legal Opinion

Harrell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 20, 1984No. 83-2162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse and remand.

In his motion, defendant claimed he provided trial counsel with the names and addresses of two potential alibi witnesses. Defense counsel allegedly failed to contact these witnesses, and failed to investigate the circumstances of the burglary. If defendant’s allegations are true, the trial counsel’s failure to investigate two potential alibi witnesses might constitute a substantial omission by defense counsel, and appellant might…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Halpin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Harrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API