Legal Opinion

Irving v. Cunningham

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,354PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from an order granting the plaintiff a new trial in the Superior Court of Alameda County. Crane, J. Petition for hearing in Bank was filed in this case after judgment, and denied.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, J.:

Appeal from an order made by the Superior Court of Alameda County, granting a new trial in a case tried before the late District Court of that county. The principal question in the case relates to the proper location of one of the calls of the deed executed by Domingo Peralta to Hall McAllister and others, on the 16th of August, 1853. The language of the deed describing the northern boundary line of the land conveyed by it is: “A line drawn from a point two hundred varas south of a house occupied by a squatter named Espejo, and passing to a point at a small creek (un arroyito), about…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bjorman v. Fort Bragg Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Curtiss v. Starr & Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API