Rantz v. School Committee of Peabody
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.
We are asked to rule that a tenured principal is entitled to the same protection against dismissal as is afforded *384to a tenured teacher, under G. L. c. 71, § 42 (1984 ed.).2 We so hold and accordingly affirm the judgment. The relevant facts are summarized as follows.
The plaintiff, Phyllis Rantz, held a regular teaching position in the Peabody school system from 1961 through 1968.3 In May of 1968, the plaintiff was elected to the position of assistant principal for the 1968-1969 school year. She served in that capacity until August of 1977, at which time she was elected principal of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frye v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Downey v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Kelley v. School Committee of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- McDevitt v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Sweeney v. School Committee of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coyne v. City of SomervilleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Downing v. City of LowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Matthews v. SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF BEDFORDMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Assad v. Berlin-Boylston Regional School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Ballotte v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.