Legal Opinion

Rantz v. School Committee of Peabody

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 11, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

We are asked to rule that a tenured principal is entitled to the same protection against dismissal as is afforded *384to a tenured teacher, under G. L. c. 71, § 42 (1984 ed.).2 We so hold and accordingly affirm the judgment. The relevant facts are summarized as follows.

The plaintiff, Phyllis Rantz, held a regular teaching position in the Peabody school system from 1961 through 1968.3 In May of 1968, the plaintiff was elected to the position of assistant principal for the 1968-1969 school year. She served in that capacity until August of 1977, at which time she was elected principal of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frye v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Downey v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Kelley v. School Committee of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  4. McDevitt v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Sweeney v. School Committee of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coyne v. City of SomervilleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  2. Downing v. City of LowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Matthews v. SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF BEDFORDMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Assad v. Berlin-Boylston Regional School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Ballotte v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API