Legal Opinion
Launois v. Midland-Ross Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 23, 1990No. 88 Civ. 1140 (BN)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
NEWMAN, Senior Judge of the United States Court of International Trade sitting as a United States District Court Judge by designation.
INTRODUCTION
Andre Launois (“Launois”), a resident and citizen of France, brings this diversity action alleging breach of an Employment Agreement entered into between Launois and defendant Midland-Ross Corporation (“Midland-Ross”) dated July 16, 1986.
Launois requests recovery of: (1) cash bonuses of between $70,000 and $120,000 per annum for 1987 and 1988, with interest, pursuant to the Second Proviso in § 3.1(b)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ricardo Garza v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc., and Third-Party v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- William Rothenberg v. Lincoln Farm Camp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Nrm Corporation v. Hercules IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- E. P. Hinkel & Company, Inc. v. The Manhattan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pereira v. Centel Corp. (In Re Argo Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Sea Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- American Special Risk Insurance v. Delta America Re InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Launois v. Midland-Ross CorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991