First National Bank v. Pennington
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Hunt. Tried below before Hon. H. 0. Head. In Buzad v. Bank of Greenville, 67 Texas, 83, and in opinion in this-case will be found a sufficient statement of the matters discussed.
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Associate Justice.
By this suit, as finally amended, appellant seeks to recover against J. R. Pennington and B. F, Buzard a judgment for the amount of two promissory notes. One of said notes was signed by Pennington alone, and the other was signed by Pennington and J. B. Mahaifey alone.
The petition contains two counts, one charging Buzard as Pennington’s partner, and the other charging that if Buzard is not liable as such part*274ner he is liable because Pennington, in executing the notes in suit, acted as his agent and for his benefit.
But two errors are assigned, one relating to the issue…
2Cited by7 opinions
- George v. Ryon, AdministratrixTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Jordan v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Lieber v. Mercantile National Bank at DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Tucker v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Kempner v. Huntsville State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.