Legal Opinion

State v. Inman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1979No. KCD 29777PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOMERVILLE, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was charged with receiving stolen property (Section 560.270, RSMo 1969). A Putnam County jury before whom he cast his lot found him guilty as charged and fixed his punishment at thirty days confinement in the county jail and payment of a fine in the amount of $350.00 (Section 560.161.1(2) and .2(2), RSMo 1969). Judgment and sentence were rendered and pronounced accordingly.

None of the three rulings of the trial court with which defendant takes issue on appeal need be set forth as the evidence was insufficient to make a submissible case. Defendant’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. State v. BashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. State v. McGlatherySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HayesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. ShawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. State v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API