Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ramco Operating Co. v. Gassett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1995No. 84543Published

1DissentOpala, Justice

The court assumes today its original jurisdiction to prohibit the respondent-judge from *945enforcing his November. 15, 1993 order, entered in Cause No. CJ-93-4842, District Court, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.1 The record entry here in issue orders Rameo Operating Company f/k/a Rameo Holding Corp. [Rameo] to produce data deemed indispensable in the United States Trust Company of New York’s [Trust] 'post-judgment quest to value Robert E. Yaw, II’s [Yaw] stock in Rameo, a privately held corporation. The nisi prius judge, respondent here, considered these data necessary to the certificated…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Peppers Refining Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Dibert v. D'ArcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API