Suiter v. . Brittle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal— Certiorari. PETITION for a certiorari heard at October Term, 1884, of the Supreme Court. The petitioner alleged in substance that the judgment was rendered against him on the 13th day of April, 1883, and on the same day he caused a notice of appeal to be filed in the record and filed his appeal bond and statement of the case on appeal.
Read the full summary
Appeal— Certiorari. PETITION for a certiorari heard at October Term, 1884, of the Supreme Court. The petitioner alleged in substance that the judgment was rendered against him on the 13th day of April, 1883, and on the same day he caused a notice of appeal to be filed in the record and filed his appeal bond and statement of the case on appeal. That his counsel instructed the clerk of the Superior Court to send a transcript of the record to the October Term, 1883, of the Supreme Court, which the petitioner alleges, that the clerk did, but the transcript was never received by the clerk of the…
1Opinion of the CourtMejjrimoN, J.
The action mentioned in the petition was tried at Spring term of 1883 of the Superior Court of Northampton county, and there was judgment for the defendants, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. This appeal was not docketed in this court at the term thereof next after the appeal was taken, which was its October term of 1883, nor was it docketed here until the 2d day of February, 1884. A.t the Spring term of 1884 of this court, it was dismissed, because it was not brought up to the October term next preceding that term, and no steps had been taken at the October term mentioned,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Suiter v. . BrittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Howerton v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blair v. Coakley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Norman v. . SnowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886