Legal Opinion

Novartis AG, Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. Ezra Ventures LLC

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 7, 2018No. 2017-2284PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chen, Circuit Judge.

*1369 SUMMARY

This case concerns the interplay between a patent term extension (PTE) granted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 156 and the obviousness-type double patenting doctrine. The Delaware District Court concluded that, in accordance with statutory construction principles and as a logical extension of this court's holding in Merck & Co. v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. , 482 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2007), obviousness-type double patenting does not invalidate an otherwise validly obtained PTE under § 156. We agree and accordingly affirm.

BACKGROUND

Defendant-Appellant Ezra Ventures LLC (Ezra)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Bates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. DiCarlo v. St. Mary HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Glaxo Operations Uk Limited v. Donald J. Quigg, Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re CELLECT, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
  2. Allergan USA, Inc. v. Msn Laboratories Private Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
  3. Abiomed, Inc. v. Maquet Cardiovascular LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
  4. Arkose Labs Holdings, Inc. v. DataDomeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
  5. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated v. SBH Holdings LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API