Novartis AG, Novartis Pharm. Corp. v. Ezra Ventures LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Chen, Circuit Judge.
*1369 SUMMARY
This case concerns the interplay between a patent term extension (PTE) granted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 156 and the obviousness-type double patenting doctrine. The Delaware District Court concluded that, in accordance with statutory construction principles and as a logical extension of this court's holding in Merck & Co. v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. , 482 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2007), obviousness-type double patenting does not invalidate an otherwise validly obtained PTE under § 156. We agree and accordingly affirm.
BACKGROUND
Defendant-Appellant Ezra Ventures LLC (Ezra)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Bates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- DiCarlo v. St. Mary HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Glaxo Operations Uk Limited v. Donald J. Quigg, Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re CELLECT, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Allergan USA, Inc. v. Msn Laboratories Private Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Abiomed, Inc. v. Maquet Cardiovascular LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Arkose Labs Holdings, Inc. v. DataDomeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated v. SBH Holdings LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.