Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Sharp

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1910Published

Demurrer to defendants’ counterclaims,

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

Plaintiff brings this action to recover $2,989, with interest and protest fees, on four past due promissory notes, made payable to his order by the defendants in their copartnership name in the year 1909.

Defendants have served an amended answer which does not deny any of the allegations of the complaint, but which sets up two counterclaims thereto.

The first counterclaim charges that, about three years prior to the commencement of plaintiff’s suit, the defendants placed a quantity of fruit with plaintiff’s then firm to be sold on commission, with instructions not to export any of it under any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Colgrove v. . TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Goodwin v. . GriffisNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Scott v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  5. Spofford v. . RowanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API