Legal Opinion

Stone v. Sleeper

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1882Published

Trover. Facts found by a referee. The plaintiff’s goods were in the possession of Pomfret, under an agreement that they should be his when he paid for them. Without paying for them, Pom-fret absconded, and gave a bill of sale of all his “ claim, right, and title to ” them to Carpenter, one of his creditors, who had notice of the plaintiff’s claim. Carpenter sold the goods to the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtDoe, C. J.

The plaintiff is entitled to judgment. Holt v. Holt, 58 N. H. 276; Weeks v. Pike, 60 N. H. 447; Luther v. Cote, 61 N. H. 129; Gould v. Blodgett, 61 N. H. 115.

Case discharged.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gould v. BlodgettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
  2. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878
  3. Luther v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
  4. Weeks v. PikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881