Legal Opinion
2001 Inc. v. Novaglas Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1973No. 72-C-1080PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINSTEIN, District Judge.
In this action for patent infringement, several months after answering, defendant submitted four counterclaims. The first two were allowed, the third denied, and now filing of the fourth is at issue.
The counterclaim is for $7,617.66 allegedly due defendant for sale of equipment to plaintiff under its former name. While defendant alleges that the pieces of equipment were covered by the patents which are in issue in the suit, it has not *650claimed that determination of the patent question would resolve the issues of this fourth counterclaim. Therefore the counterclaim…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Heyward-Robinson CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Wendell v. Holland-America LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Elliott v. RoachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hercules Inc. v. Dynamic Export Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Salomon S.A. v. Alpina Sports Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1990
- PIC, Inc. v. Prescon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Unispec Development Corp. v. Harwood K. Smith & PartnersDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.