Legal Opinion

People v. Velazquez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Refusing to discredit the uncontradicted testimony of the sole witness at the suppression hearing, the Appellate Division affirmed the finding that the car in which defendant was riding was stopped because it was speeding. We have no occasion to disturb either this affirmed finding, which is supported by the record, or the conclusion that the stop was therefore valid (see generally, People v Ingle, 36 NY2d 413).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur; Judge Alexander taking no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Montano v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. People v. McLaurinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. RosarioCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  5. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API