Legal Opinion

King v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 10, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeWITT, J.

This was an action of ejectment involving title to eight tracts of land. The Chancellor awarded tracts number one, two, four, six and seven, and part of number five to complainant, IT. B. King, Executor. As to tract number eight, the Chancellor held that complainant was entitled to all of this land, except the mineral interests therein, which he held were vested in the defendants.

The defendants have appealed from all of the decree of the Chancellor and they insist that they are entitled to' all of these lands and all of the interests therein. The complainant has appealed from that part of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blagge v. MilesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
  2. Lee v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Sheafer v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Young v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Zwingle v. WilkinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  2. Harrison v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  3. Christiansen v. Rolich Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API