Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Ingram
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 20, 2002PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, P.J.:
¶ 1 Ingram appeals from the judgment of sentence following his conviction of two violations of the Uniform Firearms Act, one count of possession of a controlled substance and one count of possession of a weapon on school property. Upon review, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
¶ 2 The trial court summarized the procedural history of this case as follows:
The defendant was charged with two (2) violations of the Uniform Firearms Act: Persons not to Possess Firearms (18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6105) and Firearms not to be Carried Without a License (18 Pa. C.S.A. § 6106), two (2) violations…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. PakackiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. LehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.