Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Mintz

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1930No. Docket No. 17Published

1Dissent

MARKS, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

We concur and dissent.

We concur in the foregoing opinion in sustaining the judgment of conviction of Tetta Stromberg, and in the conclusion reached that the judgment of conviction of all appellants under the second count of the information cannot be sustained.

We dissent from the order reversing their convictions under this count without directing the trial court to grant their motion for new trial.

This prosecution was instituted under section 403a of the Penal Code which provides as follows:

“Any person who displays a red flag, banner or badge or any flag,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. McGowan v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. King v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People Ex Rel. Bradford v. BarbiereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API