Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kuperschmid v. Tauszig

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 27, 1925Published

1Dissent

Guy, J. (dissenting):

The indorsement on the summons states: “ The nature and substance of the cause of action herein is for negligence. The defendant is the owner of premises 278E Houston St., N. Y. C., and negligently maintained a roof so that water flowed into the portion of the premises occupied by the plaintiff, a tenant thereof, and damaged sugar in the premises to the extent of $600.60. The damages were sustained on August 19, 1922.”

There is no allegation of a breach of contract between plaintiff, tenant, and defendant, landlord, and an examination of the lease, which was introduced in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schick v. FleischhauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Cook v. . SouleNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Lichtig v. PoundtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  4. Levy v. RooseveltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Volga Realty Corp. v. Chauncey Holt Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API