Legal Opinion

Spartichino v. Commissioner of Metropolitan District Commission

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 10, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Under G. L. c. 92, § 63B, as inserted by St. 1948, c. 653, a Metropolitan District police officer may receive pay lost “by reason of absence from duty . . . because of temporary incapacity caused by injury suffered through no fault of his own while in the actual performance of duty.” See discussion of the statute in Montague v. Commissioner of the Metropolitan Dist. Commn., 9 Mass. App. Ct. 62 (1980). A judge in the Superior Court found that Spartichino, a Metropolitan District police officer, by reason of events which occurred in the line of duty and culminated on June 4, 1985, became…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. BatchelderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Broadhurst v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Capitol Bank & Trust Co. v. RichmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Griefen v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Montague v. Commissioner of the Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thurlow v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Trustees of Paul Revere Realty Trust v. Revere License CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API