Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Moffat Tunnel Improvement District v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 25, 1933No. 13,375Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice Bouck,

specially concurring.

In the judgment just rendered herein by this court I concur. My concurrence is not to he understood as approving certain expressions in Mr. Justice Holland’s opinion which I think are not necessary to the decision of this case; hence the present concurring- opinion.

The Moffat Tunnel Act (S. L. ’22, c. 2, pp. 88-108 [0. L. ’21, §§9590-9511]) created the Moffat Tunnel Improvement District as. a separate municipal corporation, and established the Moffat Tunnel Commission as the managing and controlling agency of the district. The act also provided for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leckenby v. Post Printing & Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Otero Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API