United States v. The Haytian Republic
District Court, D. Oregon
These were interventions by Burckhardt Bros, and others to secure payment of various claims out of the proceeds of the Haytian Republic, which was heretofore adjudged to be forfeited to the United States for smuggling. See 57 Fed. 508; 8 C. G. A. 182, 59 Fed. 476; and 14 Sup. Ct. 992.
1Opinion of the Court
BELLINGER, District Judge.
Burckhardt Bros, intervene on behalf of themselves, and as assignees of a large number of claims against the Haytian Republic, and petition for payment thereof out of the proceeds of the sale of the vessel under forfeiture to the government, now in the registry of the court. Ten of these claims are for supplies furnished and work done during June, 1894, when the vessel was in custody of the marshal. They have no place in- this intervention. If they are bona fide claims, they are already provided for in the order which has been made for expenses incurred in taking…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Corsica Transit Co. v. W. S. Moore Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- United States v. The Louis OlsenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1896