Legal Opinion

Smith v. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Superior Court

Decided July 1, 1871PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Blair, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtNewcomb, J.

The complaint in this case alleges that in the year 1859, the plaintiff, and divers other parlies, contracted with the Peru & Indianapolis Railroad Company to grade, and furnish with cross-ties a switch, at the village of Vertland; that the railroad company agreed that it would furnish the iron, and lay the track on said switch, and forever thereafter keep the same in repair, and that it should remain a permanent switch and shipping station,for the use of the parties so grading, and furnishing the ties, and for the public gen*89erally; that the plaintiff and his associates fully performed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. StearnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Foot v. New Haven & Northampton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1854
  3. Harper v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Carter v. HarlanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Reade v. LivingstonNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
  3. Bloss v. PlymaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Robins v. FowlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840
  5. Hall v. CannteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API