Legal Opinion

Succession of Holloway

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 29, 1988No. 87-C-2093PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

531 So.2d 431 (1988)

SUCCESSION OF HOLLOWAY.

No. 87-C-2093.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 29, 1988.

Rehearing Denied March 31, 1988.

Walter White, Nelson, Hammons & Johnson, Shreveport, for applicant.

Lawrence May, Vivian, for respondent.

CALOGERO, Justice.

Louisiana's statutory will is one which "shall be dated." R.S. 9:2442(B). This case presents two essential questions:

1) Is this a mandatory requirement, so that the absence of a date is a fatal defect?

2) Is "the ______ day of February 1984" a date?

A case with relevant facts almost identical to the one now before us, Succession of Gordon v.…

Also in this document: Dissent · Lemmon; Dissent · Lemmon.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heffner v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  2. In Re Succession of NunleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Succession of BoydSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  4. Succession of O'BrienSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Conner v. Motors Insurance CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Succession of HolbrookSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  2. Testa Distributing Co., Inc. v. TarverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Successions of ToneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
  4. State ex rel. Dept. of Transportation & Development v. ScramuzzaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Hendry v. Succession of HelmsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API