Legal Opinion

People v. Crespo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, since his trial attorney did not know that People v Mingo (125 Misc 2d 373) had been reversed by this court (121 AD2d 307), and was unaware of People v Petralia (62 NY2d 47). This lapse does not warrant reversal. The request for production of the undercover officer would not have been successful in any event, and the mere request for such relief, even if the result of ignorance, did not prejudice defendant. It has not been shown that counsel, who properly moved for suppression, did not competently cross-examine the officer,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. PetraliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. MingoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. MingoNew York Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BeneventoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API