United States v. Mecca Export Corp.
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CARMAN, Judge:
The question before the Court is whether the Court may continue to hear a cross-claim or third-party claim where the main action is terminated on non-jurisdictional grounds, even if the cross-claim or third-party claim does not satisfy the requirement of Federal subject matter jurisdiction. The Court holds that it may.
Plaintiff, United States, moves to sever and redesignate the lead portion of this action as Court No. 85-5-00691S, and to dismiss this redesignated portion. Third-party defendants Brach, Green, Fried and Granada Electronics, Inc. move to dismiss…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dery v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company v. Pargas, Inc. v. Union Tank Car Co., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
- Republic Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Fidelity Insurance v. Sweet Little Mexico Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Thyssenkrupp Mexinox S.A. De C v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Cormorant Shipholding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Cormorant Shipholding Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- United States v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2017