Legal Opinion
Motley v. Virginia State Bar
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 25, 2006No. 05-2265PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
2Per curiam
Victor A. Motley appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action under *192the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Motley v. Virginia State Bar, 403 F.Supp.2d 468 (E.D.Va.2005). We also deny Motley’s motion to recuse. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Motley v. Virginia State BarDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
4Cited by1 opinion
- Livingston v. N.C. State BarDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019