Legal Opinion

State v. Holland

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 5, 1993PublishedCited by 239 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITE, Judge.

This is an appeal as of right filed pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure by William Earl Holland, the appellant. Holland was convicted by a Tip-ton County jury of aggravated rape and especially aggravated burglary. 1 The trial judge sentenced Holland to twenty-five years as a range one offender on the aggravated rape conviction and to twenty years as a range two multiple offender on the aggravated burglary conviction and ordered the sentences served consecutively.

Two issues are raised on this appeal. Fust, Holland questions the sufficiency of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. CabbageTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. AshbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. BarkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by239 opinions

  1. State v. BuggsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. BushTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BakerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. State v. KiserTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State of Tennessee v. Marcus PopeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013

234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API