Thorne v. Barth
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District. Action by Richard Van Wyck Thorne against Bernard Barth. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The plaintiff, a broker, seeks to recover a commission of $200 which he claims the defendant agreed to pay him if he would secure a loan of $20,000 upon a house owned by the defendant”, situated at No. 609 Sixth avenue, borough of Manhattan, New York City. The pleadings were oral and the answer was a general denial. What the real contract was between the parties and whether the loan was secured through the instrumentality of the plaintiff were the questions disputed upon the trial. The defendant claims the decision of the trial justice in favor of the plaintiff was against the weight of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Franck v. BlazierOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Williams v. Knight Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Krensky v. LynchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
- Williams v. Knight Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919