Legal Opinion

Rose City Property Owners' Ass'n v. Thorne

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 30, 1989No. 88-300PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

On July 28, 1987, the appellees, in their capacity as North Little Rock taxpayers, filed a complaint in which they alleged an illegal exaction by the City of North Little Rock. The case was set for trial at 9:00 a.m., on March 2, 1988. The appellants sought to intervene at the last moment, 4:27 p.m., on March 1,1988. The trial court ruled that the motion to intervene was not timely filed. Appellants appeal the ruling. We affirm, without reaching the merits of the case, because the appellants did not comply with Rule 9(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. v. JamesonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Board of Education v. Ozark School District No. 14Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. MosbacherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. MosbacherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. MosbacherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API