Legal Opinion

Banco De Ponce v. Hinsdale Supermarket Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 26, 1987No. 86 C 1988PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NICKERSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Banco de Ponce (“Banco”), brings this interpleader action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22, providing, in pertinent part, that persons “having claims against the plaintiff may be joined as defendants and required to interplead when their claims are such that the plaintiff is or may be exposed to double or multiple liability.”

Banco asks the court to determine the ownership of $70,885.10 in food coupon proceeds generated under the Special Supplemental Food Program, 42 U.S.C. § 1786. That program, sometimes called the WIC…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. John v. Sotheby's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. Morningside Supermarket Corp. v. New York State Department of HealthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff/counterclaim-Defendant/appellant v. California State Board of Equalization Richard Nevins, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Equalization Conway H. Collis, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization William M. Bennett, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the State Board of Equalization, Clive Miller, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellee. Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff/counterclaim-Defendant/appellee v. California State Board of Equalization, and Clive Miller, Defendant/counterclaimant/appellant. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Geler v. National Westminster Bank USADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API