Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Mechanics' Traders' Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 17, 1929No. 29462PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

The plaintiff held a mortgage note for $7,350 executed by one George Let-ten. He also held a policy of insurance for $7,000, issued by the defendant against the mortgaged premises. Plaintiff was indebted to Dendinger, Inc., and delivered to his creditor the note and the policy to secure the amount of his indebtedness. No change was made, however, in the “loss payable clause” of the policy. The mortgaged property was destroyed by fire, and Dendinger, Inc,., promptly demanded payment for the loss. This demand was refused by the insurance company on the ground of lack of interest. Later,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Insurance v. PorterSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  2. Succession of DelassizeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  3. Dugue v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Dwelling House Insurance v. Kansas Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
  5. Grice v. PearsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Joint Stock Land Bank v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API