Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Hetterick

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 15, 1853PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The probate of the will of the decedent is opposed, on the ground of insufficient proof of formal execution, pursuant to the provisions of the statute.

The decedent signed the will in the presence of the subscribing witnesses, and they, subscribed in his presence and at his request. Neither of the witnesses proves any testamentary declaration.

The decedent was in bed, sick. He sent for the witnesses. They came. He took the instrument from under his pillow, and said he had “ an instrument in writing ” he wanted them to witness. He took the paper from an *428envelope, opened it, handed…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of TurrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of DelpratNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  3. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of TurrellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  4. In re the Estate of CrillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
  5. Burke v. NolanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API