Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Decker v. Glenfed, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1994No. 92-55419Published

1Concurrence

WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge,

concurring, joined by BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and RYMER, Circuit Judges, as to Parts I & III:

I agree with the majority that Rule 9(b) does not require plaintiffs to plead facts giving rise to an inference of scienter. I write separately, however, for two reasons: (1) to respond to the concerns of our sister circuits that have read an inference of scienter test into 9(b), and (2) to express my own concern that the majority’s discussion of the particularity requirement of 9(b) destabilizes settled Ninth Circuit law by effectively reading into the Rule a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re Time Warner Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Semegen v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API