Legal Opinion

Trim v. Milham

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Sloan, J.

This is a proceeding, in the nature of mandamus brought pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, to compel the Police Commissioners of the City of Cortland to cancel a work schedule alleged to be in violation of section 1 of chapter 360 of the Laws of 1911, as amended, and to direct that a work schedule in conformity with said statute be adopted. The petitioners are 3 of 22 patrolmen of the City Police Department to which the criticized work schedule applies.

Section 1, as amended by chapter 964 of the Laws of 1957, which became effective July 1,1957, provides insofar as it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Allen v. McClearyNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Leonard v. HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Buffalo Audio Center Arrolite Co. v. Union Free School District No. 1New York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Buffalo Audio Center Arrolite Co. v. Union Free School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Del Gaudio v. ZurmuhlenNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nassau Chapter v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Held v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API