Legal Opinion
Bland v. Hartman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1957No. 15155PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by Bland from an order granting a motion to dismiss the complaint and denying a preliminary injunction.
The record, consisting of the complaint and a hearing on the preliminary injunction, showed Bland was a commissioned officer in the United States Naval Reserve who had served on active duty from 1942 to February 22, 1946. On the latter date, he was separated from active duty status under honorable conditions. From that date, he was placed on inactive status and held a commission as Lieutenant in the United States Naval Reserve.
On December 29,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parker v. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Marshall v. WymanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Levin v. GillespieDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Reynolds v. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
3Cited by9 opinions
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. American International Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Emmett J. Stebbins v. Keystone Insurance Company Emmett J. Stebbins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Robert O. Bland v. John D. Connally, Secretary of the Navy, and IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Frank B. Killian CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Selden G. Hooper v. C. C. Hartman, Rear Admiral Usn, Commandant, Eleventh Naval DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.