Legal Opinion

Jafolla & Mark, Inc. v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1937No. Appeal, 299PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

Legal plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant for construction work in connection with the South Broad Street Subway. It contained a provision that “the said party of the first part [the City of Philadelphia] hereby agrees to pay to the party of the second part [Jafolla & Mark, Incorporated], in warrants to be drawn on the City Treasurer, signed by the said Director of City Transit, for the said work, the sums or prices as set forth in the proposal attached hereto and made a part hereof. The party of the second part agrees to accept the said warrants in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Scranton v. Hyde Park Gas, Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Biddle v. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API