Legal Opinion

Mickels v. Fennell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEngerud, J.

Defendant has appealed to this court from a judgment declaring the nullity of a pretended marriage theretofore existing between herself and plaintiff, and awarding to plaintiff the custody of the child which resulted from the union. The case is here for trial de novo.

It is conceded that the marriage was bigamous, and void for that reason. The only controversy is as to the custody of the child. Plaintiff claims that he was induced to enter into the pretended marriage by reason of defendant’s fraudulent representation that her former husband was dead. This contention was sustained by *189the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graham v. BennetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Watts v. OwensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Jenkins v. JenkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Rufer v. RuferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Woodward v. BlakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  5. First National Bank in Grand Forks v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API