Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Noyes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 1, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

This is an action upon the covenants against incumbrances and of warranty in a deed of land from the defendant to the plaintiff’s grantor. To maintain the action, the plaintiff must show a breach of one of the covenants after he became the assignee of the land. A right of action for a breach of a covenant is a chose in "action, and does not pass with the land. The plaintiff cannot recover upon evidence which shows a right of action in Hadley, his grantor, and the immediate covenantee of the covenants sued upon. So far as the evidence tends to prove any right of action upon the defendant’s…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kunkle v. BeckOhio Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Gallison v. DowningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Bull v. BeisekerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Jenks v. HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Coleman v. BresnahamNew York Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API