Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Adams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1930No. 19805PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAFFER, C.

This is ah action brought originally by R. R. Kirchner and the Ghamplin Refining Company against, all the parties involved in this appeal, to fore; close lien against an oil and gas lease, etc. Judgment was rendered (for the amount claimed and foreclosing- the lien. From this part of the judgment, no app'eal is prosecuted.

Plaintiff in error will be referred to as Arnold.- Defendant in error Adams, as Adams; and defendants in error Brooker, Powell, Warren, and Carmichael as Brooker et al.. The controversy arose over the drilling of a well for oil and gas on the land belonging…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Uncle Sam Oil Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Twin States Oil Co. v. Westerly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. HardwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Ark. La. Gas Company v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Mohawk Drilling Co. v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Edwards v. HardwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API