Jennings v. Hare
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Action by B. I. Jennings against Florence S. Hare and W. C. Black, for foreclosure of two mortgages. The issues were referred to the master, who made the following report: The master, to whom it was referred to hear and determine the issues of law and fact raised by the pleadings in the above stated case, respectfully begs leave to report that he has held references, and taken the testimony herewith submitted.
Read the full summary
Action by B. I. Jennings against Florence S. Hare and W. C. Black, for foreclosure of two mortgages. The issues were referred to the master, who made the following report: The master, to whom it was referred to hear and determine the issues of law and fact raised by the pleadings in the above stated case, respectfully begs leave to report that he has held references, and taken the testimony herewith submitted. From the testimony the master finds that, a short time prior to the 29th day of September, 1892, the defendant, W. C. Black, contracted with one John B- Hare, the husband of the…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This action was commenced on the 12th day of June, 1895, to foreclose two mortgages on the house and lot described in the complaint. The facts are fully stated in the report of the master, which will be set out in the report of the case, and it is only necessary to refer to it for a proper understanding of the questions raised *286by the exceptions. When the case was heard by his Honor, Judge Benet, he overruled all the exceptions to the master’s report except the plaintiff’s first exception, which was as follows: “Because the master in…
2Cited by2 opinions
- McCarty-greene Motor Co. v. McCluneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Hines v. CheshireWashington Supreme Court · 1950