Garcia v. Angulo

I concur in the Court’s holding that Garcia is a domiciliary of the State of Maryland. My reasons for writing separately are twofold. First, the majority acknowledges that the issue is whether Garcia was a domiciliary of Maryland on the date of the accident, December 13, 1991,1 but then in concluding he was a domiciliary on that date, the majority apparently relies on subsequent presidential directives which occurred long after Garcia’s accident and which could not háve been anticipated by Garcia in 1991.2 Second, the majority fails to *490recognize the importance of uniformity in determining…